Pontential table and value range for talents

- There is also a danish version.

This is only a guideline!
Notes: Click into the picture for a better/easier view.




Percentage - of all attributes set up in order of priority after vman´s setup:

Keeper:
Handling 19.23%
In the air 19.23%
Jump 19.23%
One against a 19.23%
Speed ​​7.69%
Acceleration 7.69%
Passing 1.92%
Endurance 1.92%
Fighting spirit 1.92%
Leadership 1.92%

Defense:
Tackling 40.54%
Speed ​​16.89%
Acceleration 16.89%
Passing 6.76%
Dribbling 3.38%
Endurance 3.38%
Fighting spirit 3.38%
Deadball situation 3.38%
Leadership 3.38%
Completion 2.03%

Midfield:
Passing 22,58%
Dribbling 19.35%
Endurance 16.13%
Completion 12.90%
Speed ​​9.68%
Fighting spirit 6.45%
Tackling 3.23%
Acceleration 3.23%
Deadball situations 3.23%
Leadership 3.23%

Forward:
Completion 30.03%
Dribbling 24.02%
Speed ​​15.02%
Acceleration 15.02%
Passing 3%
Fighting spirit 3%
Deadball situation 3%
Leadership 3%
Endurance 2.4%
Tackling 1.5%

With regard to pension rate:

The older a player becomes, the more likely he chooses to retire.
It is therefore important to keep in mind the amount of cost / risk you would take.
Unlike how much quality you can get for the credits you want to spend.
When a player is older than 31, he may retire.

Note your players will not retire as 30-year-olds.

Age
31: 0% 0% - ONLY VERY, VERY FEW! Around 1-2 out of 1,000 players.
31.1: 0.06%
31.2: 0.21%
31.3: 0.44%
31.4: 0.77%
31.5: 1.18%
31.6: 1.69%
31.7: 2.29%
31.8: 2.98%
31.9: 3.77%
32: 4.65%
32.1: 5.62%
32.2: 6.69%
32.3: 7.85%
32.4: 9.09%
32.5: 10.43%
32.6: 11.85%
32.7: 13.35%
32.8: 14.94%
32.9: 16.6%
33: 18.33%
33.1: 20.13%
33.2: 22%
33.3: 23.92%
33.4: 25.91%
33.5: 27.94%
33.6: 30.02%
33.7: 32.13%
33.8: 34.28%
33.9: 36.46%
34: 38.67%
34.1: 40.88%
34.2: 43.11%
34.3: 45.34%
34.4: 47.58%
34.5: 49.8%
34.6: 52.01%
34.7: 54.21%
34.8: 56.37%
34.9: 58.51%
35: 60.62%
35.1: 62.69%
35.2: 64.71%
35.3: 66.69%
35.4: 68.62%
35.5: 70.49%
35.6: 72.31%
35.7: 74.06%
35.8: 75.76%
35.9: 77.39%
36: 78.95%
36.1: 80.45%
36.2: 81.88%
36.3: 83.24%
36.4: 84.53%
36.5: 85.76%
36.6: 86.91%
36.7: 88%
36.8: 89.03%
36.9: 89.99%
37: 90.89%
37.1: 91.73%
37.2: 92.51%
37.3: 93.23%
37.4: 93.9%
37.5: 94.51%
37.6: 95.08%
37.7: 95.6%
37.8: 96.07%
37.9: 96.51%
38: 96.9%
38.1: 97.26%
38.2: 97.58%
38.3: 97.87%
38.4: 98.13%
38.5: 98.36%
38.6: 98.57%
38.7: 98.76%
38.8: 98.92%
38.9: 99.07%
39: 99.2%
39.1: 99.31%
39.2: 99.41%
39.3: 99.5%
39.4: 99.57%
39.5: 99.64%
39.6: 99.69%
39.7: 99.74%
39.8: 99.78%
39.9: 99.82%
40: 99.85%
40.1: 99.87%
40.2: 99.9%
40.3: 99.91%
40.4: 99.93%
40.5: 99.94%
40.6: 99.95%
40.7: 99.96%
40.8: 99.97%
40.9: 99.97%
41: 99.98%
41.1: 99.98%
41.2: 99.99%
41.3: 99.99%
41.4: 99.99%
41.5: 99.99%
41.6: 99.99%
41.7: 100%
41.8: 100%
41.9: 100%
42: 100%

- Reserved

Hi, i'm a newbie, what is the Point column representing ? Thank you.

Training Averages

Appreciate your work, but could you tell me what data you used for those petential values please?

Whittall United wrote:

Appreciate your work, but could you tell me what data you used for those petential values please?

Seen the market, seen other clubs ranking on a player.
Talked with some few people and then seen alot schedules like https://www.virtualmanager.com/forums/topics/1016801-player-value-chart, https://www.virtualmanager.com/forums/topics/1131798-training-value and many other schedules. Ive made my own moditification to the current state of vman situation from all the schedules and combined them to the best and newest to what it could be for the clubs because many clubs are sitting on alot of credits compared to the new starting clubs.

As i said in the schedule its not 100 % but more like a guideline to users.

Its based from earlier schedules and then combined to the current state from vman´s users perspective today. Its from months statistics where personally collected data from trades where buyers have set their bid based on thier abilities and training results as a youth player and peoples experience on buying/selling youth players on forums.
Vmaninfo.dk have also been a great help.

This Schedule gets more and more dependable over time if more and more help to the statistics made on the potential value - But yes "Player values prices" is more like a rough guideline, than an an actual guide - But the potential table and pension of players are pretty accurate.

Yes the other stuff seems fine, just the values seemed abit off, certainly the higher training players, not ever seen a player sell for more than 100m, so when i seen 300m being quoted, was just curious how you got those values.

Thanks for the response

True we all know that
But look at the top clubs who got millions and millions of credits.
If younger clubs hold more on their players they will have to pay more.
Or then they will lose player over time.
But yes over +50 m its vary off we can agree to that.
Its more a guide to what it could be but yes it will properly soon be edited to more realistic numbers with those over +50 m.

Up