I've been reading on the curated blog posts from Sudoku FC and stumbled on this article https://www.virtualmanager.com/blog/455-capacity-and-economy-before-and-after-the-new-stadium-system
--quote--
Effect on the individual club
There is no denying that this change will affect most clubs' finances. If we look only at the profits generated from ticket sales, small clubs will likely see a little increase while larger ones will see a minor decrease.
The small clubs should not celebrate too soon however, because the prices for upgrading your stadium has generally become more expensive. More money will be required to get a large stadium.
Some larger clubs will observe that they cannot meet the ticket demand because their stadiums are smaller. This will reduce their profit. However, this drop can be somehow minimized by just increasing ticket prices.
Aggregately, the clubs that are hit the most will of course still be able to earn more than their fixed expenses.
Effect on the game's economy in general
There will be generated less Credits. And while that might sound a bit depressing, we believe it is a nice side benefit of the new stadium system. It helps fight the inflation we have in the game (decreasing value of Credits, increasing player prices).
Some managers are nervous that this might give the clubs who trade a lot an advantage since their income is not directly hit be this change. We're sure they won't. The money that these so-called "trade clubs" earn come, when all comes to all, from the same source all other Credits come from: ticket sales. A certain reduction of the general production of Credits will thus hit the trade clubs just as hard as clubs that do not trade so much.
--quote--
It us undeniable that the last part was proven completely untrue, the Trading clubs are hoarding billions of credits that don't go back into the game's economy thus reducing prices overall.
I don't see why if the VIFA ranks are halved every week to not allow older clubs to get out of the reach of newer clubs, why the same doesn't happen to the accumulated credits?
I don't mean halving them, but having some sort of 'tax' over a certain amount. this will force player to either inject money into the economy or risk losing them.
What's the point of 10 clubs hoarding 15 billion credits?
How many lifetimes of 1st division players does that buy? I'm expecting at least 10 years IRL...
Meantime a club that doesn't trade but trains players will be disadvantaged by the lower prices and higher salary.
--quote--
Effect on the individual club
There is no denying that this change will affect most clubs' finances. If we look only at the profits generated from ticket sales, small clubs will likely see a little increase while larger ones will see a minor decrease.
The small clubs should not celebrate too soon however, because the prices for upgrading your stadium has generally become more expensive. More money will be required to get a large stadium.
Some larger clubs will observe that they cannot meet the ticket demand because their stadiums are smaller. This will reduce their profit. However, this drop can be somehow minimized by just increasing ticket prices.
Aggregately, the clubs that are hit the most will of course still be able to earn more than their fixed expenses.
Effect on the game's economy in general
There will be generated less Credits. And while that might sound a bit depressing, we believe it is a nice side benefit of the new stadium system. It helps fight the inflation we have in the game (decreasing value of Credits, increasing player prices).
Some managers are nervous that this might give the clubs who trade a lot an advantage since their income is not directly hit be this change. We're sure they won't. The money that these so-called "trade clubs" earn come, when all comes to all, from the same source all other Credits come from: ticket sales. A certain reduction of the general production of Credits will thus hit the trade clubs just as hard as clubs that do not trade so much.
--quote--
It us undeniable that the last part was proven completely untrue, the Trading clubs are hoarding billions of credits that don't go back into the game's economy thus reducing prices overall.
I don't see why if the VIFA ranks are halved every week to not allow older clubs to get out of the reach of newer clubs, why the same doesn't happen to the accumulated credits?
I don't mean halving them, but having some sort of 'tax' over a certain amount. this will force player to either inject money into the economy or risk losing them.
What's the point of 10 clubs hoarding 15 billion credits?
How many lifetimes of 1st division players does that buy? I'm expecting at least 10 years IRL...
Meantime a club that doesn't trade but trains players will be disadvantaged by the lower prices and higher salary.